Five-Year Plans in Pakistan Since 1947

Introduction

Five-Year Plans in Pakistan Since 1947, Pakistan’s economic development has been structured through systematic planning since its independence in 1947. The country adopted a series of Five-Year Plans to address socio-economic challenges, aiming to achieve sustainable growth, poverty reduction, and industrial advancement. These plans have played a significant role in shaping Pakistan’s economic and social policies. This article provides a detailed overview of the Five-Year Plans implemented in Pakistan, their aims, objectives, and outcomes, along with an analysis of key features.

1. First Five-Year Plan (1955–1960)

Aims and Objectives:

  • Focus on agricultural and industrial development.
  • Strengthen infrastructure, especially irrigation systems and transportation.
  • Promote social services such as health and education.

Key Features:

  • Targeted a GDP growth rate of 3.1% but achieved 3.3%.
  • Laid the foundation for industrialization by promoting state intervention.
  • Established Pakistan Industrial Development Corporation (PIDC).
  • Focused on agricultural reforms and irrigation projects.

Outcome: Despite modest success in industrial growth, agriculture remained underdeveloped. The plan provided a framework for future economic policies.

2. Second Five-Year Plan (1960–1965)

Aims and Objectives:

  • Achieve self-sufficiency in food production.
  • Promote industrial development, including manufacturing and textiles.
  • Develop infrastructure for transportation and energy.

Key Features:

  • Targeted 4.2% GDP growth but achieved 5.2%.
  • Focused on private sector development.
  • Introduced export-oriented policies.
  • Established large-scale industries in Karachi and Lahore.

Outcome: This plan marked a period of high growth, earning it the label of the “Golden Era of Development.” However, it also deepened economic disparities between East and West Pakistan.

3. Third Five-Year Plan (1965–1970)

Aims and Objectives:

  • Expand industrial capacity and improve agricultural productivity.
  • Enhance employment opportunities.
  • Invest in education and health sectors.

Key Features:

  • Targeted GDP growth of 6.5% but achieved 6.8%.
  • Focused on Green Revolution technologies in agriculture.
  • Improved irrigation systems and fertilizer distribution.
  • Supported small and medium enterprises (SMEs).

Outcome: The plan’s progress was disrupted by the 1965 war with India, leading to resource diversion and economic imbalances.

4. Fourth Five-Year Plan (1970–1975)

Aims and Objectives:

  • Focus on poverty alleviation and income redistribution.
  • Strengthen rural development programs.
  • Promote labor-intensive industries.

Key Features:

  • Targeted 5.6% GDP growth but achieved only 3.7%.
  • Introduced land reforms to address rural poverty.
  • Emphasized public sector expansion.

Outcome: The separation of East Pakistan in 1971 and subsequent political instability severely hampered the plan’s implementation, shifting focus to short-term measures.

5. Fifth Five-Year Plan (1978–1983)

Aims and Objectives:

  • Restore economic stability post-1971 crisis.
  • Enhance agricultural productivity and rural development.
  • Increase employment opportunities.

Key Features:

  • Targeted GDP growth of 6.5% but achieved 5.8%.
  • Focused on self-sufficiency in food production.
  • Encouraged privatization and industrial growth.

Outcome: The influx of Afghan refugees and increased defense expenditures limited the plan’s success. Nonetheless, it laid the groundwork for industrial recovery.

6. Sixth Five-Year Plan (1983–1988)

Aims and Objectives:

  • Promote private sector-led growth.
  • Increase agricultural and industrial productivity.
  • Address energy shortages.

Key Features:

  • Targeted GDP growth of 6.5%, achieving 6.4%.
  • Prioritized energy development and infrastructure improvement.
  • Introduced reforms in education and health sectors.

Outcome: The plan achieved reasonable success in growth targets but faced setbacks due to natural disasters and political instability.

7. Seventh Five-Year Plan (1988–1993)

Aims and Objectives:

  • Continue private sector promotion.
  • Improve infrastructure and energy sectors.
  • Focus on poverty alleviation and employment generation.

Key Features:

  • Targeted 6.5% GDP growth but achieved only 4.5%.
  • Emphasized structural adjustments.
  • Encouraged foreign investment and trade liberalization.

Outcome: The plan was impacted by governance issues and rising fiscal deficits, leading to moderate results.

8. Eighth Five-Year Plan (1993–1998)

Aims and Objectives:

  • Strengthen industrialization and infrastructure.
  • Enhance exports and foreign exchange reserves.
  • Promote sustainable development.

Key Features:

  • Targeted 7% GDP growth but achieved only 4%.
  • Focused on structural reforms.
  • Addressed macroeconomic imbalances.

Outcome: Political instability and external debt burdens hampered progress, leading to the suspension of the plan.

Later Developments

The Ninth Five-Year Plan (1998–2003) was never fully implemented. Pakistan shifted to the Medium-Term Development Framework (MTDF) in 2005, emphasizing annual plans to tackle emerging economic challenges.

Conclusion

Pakistan’s Five-Year Plans have played a crucial role in economic development, focusing on industrial growth, infrastructure, and poverty alleviation. While some plans achieved moderate success, others faced setbacks due to political instability, wars, and natural disasters. The transition to MTDF reflects a shift toward adaptive planning to meet contemporary needs.

References

  1. Government of Pakistan, Planning Commission Reports.
  2. Economic Survey of Pakistan (various editions).
  3. Hussain, I. (2010). “Pakistan: A Perspective on Economic Reforms.”
  4. Zaidi, S. A. (2015). “Issues in Pakistan’s Economy.” Oxford University Press.
  5. Khan, S. R. (2007). “Pakistan’s Economy: Current Situation and Future Outlook.”
  6. World Bank Reports on Pakistan.
  7. IMF Country Reports on Pakistan.
  8. Asian Development Bank Economic Reports.